The forty titles, the figures, and the limits of both
Forty PG SOFT titles, sixteen editions, one set of figures. These pages record what has been published about each game, and how the catalogue appears from each region covered: the interface language, the currency on screen, the name players there actually type.
What the pages cover
The slot index carries forty titles with the specification figures published for each one: RTP, volatility band, reel and grid layout, a maximum win figure where one is on record, and the release year. Around it sit sixteen regional editions, fifteen countries plus this worldwide English one. The subject is narrow on purpose. Where PG SOFT's games reach and in what form, not how to play them and not which one to pick.
Why the figures hold up
Every number has been checked against primary sources: the studio's own material, regulators' public registers, and certification statements attributed to whoever made them. Where sources conflict, the page says they conflict instead of quietly taking the more impressive number, and anything nobody could verify is marked unverified rather than rounded up. Figures are never carried across from other websites, however many of them agree. A company statement is attributed to the company and never dressed up as an audit result.
What this is not
Not PG SOFT, and not connected to PG SOFT. This is an independent reference site, not the studio's, not an operator's, endorsed by neither. There are no accounts here, no deposits, no withdrawals, no bonuses and no games running, and nothing is paid out to anybody. Nothing here says whether online play is lawful in a reader's country, because that varies by jurisdiction and keeps changing. Where a page carries a clearly marked link to an external gaming site, it is a link and not a recommendation, and it is meant for adults only.
Frequently asked questions
Is this site connected to PG SOFT?
No. It is independent of Pocket Games Soft and of any operator. Nothing here is written, approved or paid for by the studio, and where a company statement appears it is attributed as the company's statement rather than presented as a finding made here. The domain name describes the subject of the pages, not their ownership.
Where do the figures for each game come from?
Published sources, named where it matters: the studio's own specification material for RTP, layout and release year, public regulator registers for licensing, and the studio's statements about certification, quoted as statements. Nothing is estimated to fill a gap, and a maximum win figure recorded in testing data is labelled differently from one the studio advertises.
Why are the games not ranked?
Because a ranking would be a claim nobody can support. Hit frequency, generosity and the chance of reaching a ceiling are not comparable between forty different maths models, and ordering slots by a maximum win figure implies that they are. The rows are reference data. Which title is worth anyone's time is not a question these pages answer.